Well being the foundations of hedonic psychology pdf

Date published 
 

    Daniel Kahneman, Ed Diener and Norbert Schwarz. Experiences of psychic pain and pleasure, and the limitless variations on this hedonic theme, define the domain of emotions. Much of what we know about individuals’ subjective well-being (SWB) is based on self-reports of happiness. Request PDF on ResearchGate | Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology | Pleasures of the mind are different from pleasures of the body. There are. Well-Being. Foundations of Hedonic Psychology Well-Being draws upon the latest scientific research to transform our understanding of this ancient question.

    Author:EBONIE NEWSAM
    Language:English, Spanish, Japanese
    Country:Lebanon
    Genre:Academic & Education
    Pages:257
    Published (Last):24.01.2016
    ISBN:207-7-22104-275-1
    Distribution:Free* [*Registration Required]
    Uploaded by: FELICA

    63526 downloads 134157 Views 17.33MB PDF Size Report


    Well Being The Foundations Of Hedonic Psychology Pdf

    Well-Being: ~ -. The Foundations of. Hedonic Psychology. Daniel ICluhnemm,. Ed Dieneq and. Norbevzt Scbwmz. EDITORS. RUSSELL SAGE FOUNDATION. Well-Being: Foundations of Hedonic Psychology [Daniel Kahneman, Edward Diener, Norbert Schwarz] on ulblactisihe.tk *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. DMCA. Well-being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. Cached. Download as a PDF @MISC{Kubovy_well-being:the, author = {Michael Kubovy and D.

    To check for possible effects of multicollinearity, we also applied relative weights analyses to examine the variance explanation of resilience irrespective of its correlations with the personality traits. The variance explained by resilience was 0. Discussion Considering resilience as a preventive resource Hage et al. The first hypothesis was confirmed as resilience added significant incremental variance beyond that accounted for by personality traits in relation to hedonic well-being in terms of life satisfaction and PA. The results of the present study confirmed the relation — found in the literature Samani et al. The second hypothesis was also confirmed as resilience added significant incremental variance beyond that accounted for by personality traits in relation to EWB in terms of life meaning and authenticity. These results are in line with the positive association of resilience with EWB reported in the literature Souri and Hasanirad, ; He et al. The present study was the first research endeavor to examine simultaneously the contribution of resilience to hedonic well-being as well as EWB by controlling for fluid intelligence and personality traits. Regarding intelligence, the results of the study revealed no relation between fluid intelligence and well-being, as emerged in the literature Sigelman, ; Watten et al. In particular, the study highlighted a stronger association between resilience and hedonic well-being than EWB as resilience is considered the ability of individuals to face and overcome adversity adaptively Campbell-Sills and Stein, and to increase life satisfaction and PA. The study also revealed an association between resilience and EWB, indicating the role of resilience in relation to well-being in respect also of life meaning Morgan and Farsides, and authenticity Wood et al.

    This question can be raised at the level of self-reported affect, but it can also be raised at the biochemical levels, where pleasure and pain appear to be mediated by different neurotransmitters. A related multi-level question concerns the apparent asymmetry between the relative potencies of pain and pleasure. In the context of decision research, the overweighing of negative consequences has been called loss aversion; does this phenomenon have a counterpart at the various levels of hedonic experience?

    Another general question concerns adaptation. This label has xi sometimes been applied to negative feedback loops in the intracellular environment, and it has also been used to explain why the mean level of satisfaction with income hardly changed over a fifteen-year period in which mean income nearly doubled. Are there important commonalities in adaptation processes at different levels? Are there general characteristics of stimuli to which adaptation is easy or rapid?

    We believe that the pursuit of cross-level analogies is likely to yield useful hypotheses for future research, and we hope that bringing together discussions of these levels under a single cover will advance that process. Cross-cutting this organization by levels of analysis, there is an organization by causes and contexts. It is useful to know the circumstances under which people are most likely to experience wellbeing or misery.

    For example, what is to be made of the finding that people experience many of their happiest moments in the presence of friends, whereas more intimate family relations are often loaded with substantial ambivalence?

    Russel Sage Foundation

    And what is the impact of insecurity about the future for example, for people with no health insurance on well-being? Issues like these have rarely been addressed in psychological research, but their investigation is likely to contribute to our basic understanding of hedonic experience as well as to psychologys relevance to society. We recognize, with a large degree of humility, that scientific understanding in this field is currently woefully inadequate to provide a strong underpinning for national policies.

    We believe, however, that in the decades to come there will be much greater success in understanding hedonics, and that principles will emerge that can be used by policy makers. We are particularly hopeful that a scientific understanding of hedonic experience will allow for the development of valid hedonic indicators that reflect the pleasantness of life in the everyday experiences of people.

    At present, economic indicators hold the most sway in policy circles. Yet, the economic approach is limited in several ways.

    First, it focuses on those aspects of life that can be traded in the marketplace. Thus, desirable goods such as love, mental challenge, and stress are given little consideration. As people reach what Ronald Inglehart has labeled a postmaterialist level in which basic physical needs are xii Preface phenomena.

    Scientists are accumulating increasing knowledge of affectof mood and emotionthat promises to shed light on the long-term aspects of pleasant experience. We are beginning to understand factors such as adaptation that can strongly influence pleasurable and unpleasurable feelings, and the personality correlates of pleasant experiences are receiving increasing empirical attention. Thus, despite our relatively modest degree of understanding, progress in the science of hedonics has been made in the last several decades.

    The following chapters present overviews of the knowledge accumulated thus far about hedonics. Our advice to authors was to make the chapters accessible to educated lay readers. Our selection of topics was based on the idea that hedonics can be understood well only through an approach that brings together understanding at all levels of analysis.

    Although there are several glaring omissions in the book, we believe that most important topics are covered. And we hope that reading this volume will bring to each reader a degree of pleasure. Second, the economic view presupposes that individuals will choose the greatest amount of utility for themselves; yet a great deal of evidence now contradicts this proposition. Schwarz Ed. Extraversion and Subjective Well-being in a U. Journal of Research in Personality, 26, Very Happy People.

    Psychological Science, 13 1 , Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. Lopez Ed. Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, , Similarity of the relations between marital status and subjective well-being across cultures.

    Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31 4 , Ellison, C.

    Does religious commitment contribute to individual life satisfaction? Social Forces, 68, Frederick, S. Hedonic adaptation. Specific beliefs as moderator variables in maternal coping with mental retardation.

    Fleeson, W. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, Glenn , N. Values, attitudes, and the state of American marriage.

    Popenoe, J. Blankenhorn Eds. Understanding Happiness. Love and Satisfaction. Hojjat Eds. Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Does the existence of social relationships matter for subjective well-being?

    Finkel Eds. Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7, Mastekaasa, A. Marital status, distress, and well-being: An international comparison. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 25, Myers, D. The funds, friends, and faith of happy people. American Psychologist, 55, Oswald, A. Happiness and Economic Performance. Economic Journal, , Pavot, W. Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5 2 , Sandvik, E.

    You might also like: BEAUTIFUL VISUALIZATION PDF

    Subjective Well-being: The convergence and stability of self-report and non-self-report measures. Journal of Personality, 61 3 , Scheier, M. Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies.

    The distinction between real-time experience and global retrospective evaluations raises new questions, which have not yet attracted the attention they deserve. How do global evaluations of an aspect of life, or of life as a whole, relate to the actual pleasures and pains that an individual has experienced over time?

    How accurate are these retrospective evaluations? Related questions can be raised about the accuracy of peoples predictions of their future pleasures and pains, and about their intuitive understanding of the rules of hedonic psychology. An ability to predict future tastes and experiences is central to the economic model of rational choice that provides the foundation for much of the theorizing in the social sciences and for many policy applications.

    Pursuing ones own self-interest requires appropriate predictions of the likely short-term and long-term hedonic consequences of different courses of action, but the question of how people arrive at these predictions has hardly been addressed in psychological research.

    Well-Being -- Foundations of Hedonic Psychology Chapter 1 | Pleasure | Quality Of Life

    The evidence available suggests that people may not have the ability to predict their future tastes and hedonic experiences with the accuracy that the economic model requires. Neural systems of emotion: The question of what makes for a good life can be studied at many different levels. Starting at the top of figure P. Alternative views of what constitutes a good life must be part of the analysis.

    What is Subjective Well-Being? Understanding and Measuring Subjective Well-Being

    In particular, the serious student of well-being soon discovers that quality of life cannot be reduced to the balance of pleasure and pain, or to assessments of subjective life-satisfaction; other values contribute to the judgment.

    Moreover, objective characteristics of a society, like poverty, infant mortality, crime rate, or. Though these qualifications are important, the experience of pleasure and the achievement of a subjective sense of well-being remain at the center of the story. Subjective well-being, at the next level down, involves a component of judgment and comparisons with ideals, aspirations, other people, and ones own past. Several decades ago, social scientists began large-scale investigations of individuals satisfaction with their lives and with their society.

    One of the robust findings of this research was that the correlations between global judgments of the quality of life and objective conditions of living are often quite low. Leaders in this field, such as Frank Andrews, Angus Campbell, Norman Bradburn, and Gerald Gurin, emphasized, as we do, the need for assessments of the positive aspects of life, including pleasant emotions.

    Our selection of chapters for this book belongs to this tradition, but it also departs from the past in several ways perhaps most importantly in our emphasis on subjective and on physiological measures of ongoing hedonic experience as an essential supplement to global judgments of life. One level below global well-being we find mood states, which are characterized by their persistence and by their loose connection to particular events. There are large individual differences in peoples characteristic mood, which clearly should be assigned substantial weight in assessing their well-being.

    Next we encounter affective states that are more closely related to the current situation. Preface These include the many varieties of pleasures and pains, and transient emotional states.

    Each of these affective responses has multiple aspects beyond the subjective experience of the moment: The next level of reduction involves neural systems and the biochemistry of hormones and neurotransmitters that regulate the motivational systems with which affective responses at all levels are associated. One of the important lessons of recent years is that the physiological and biochemical levels of analysis are characterized by the prevalence of opponent systems and complex feedback loops, with effects that often appear paradoxical, such as the familiar runners high.

    And it is probably at these levels that the main keys to the understanding of addictions, anhedonia, and depression will be found. This overview of levels of analysis suggests that an understanding of the higher levels will often require careful consideration of lower ones. However, there are also important influences that travel the other way. Among the most dramatic are the almost complete suppression of pain in some warwounded and in some states of exaltation and the well-documented effects of mental states on physiological responses.

    We hope that collecting treatments of the different levels of analysis in a single volume will contribute to research that traces the connections between these levels. Equally important, it may contribute to an understanding of questions that arise at several levels, and may have related answers in all. One such question is the nature of the relation between positive and negative affect: Or should we understand positive and negative affect as separate attributes of experience?

    This question can be raised at the level of self-reported affect, but it can also be raised at the biochemical levels, where pleasure and pain appear to be mediated by different neurotransmitters.

    A related multi-level question concerns the apparent asymmetry between the relative potencies of pain and pleasure. In the context of decision research, the overweighing of negative consequences has been called loss aversion; does this phenomenon have a counterpart at the various levels of hedonic experience? Another general question concerns adaptation. This label has. Are there important commonalities in adaptation processes at different levels?

    Are there general characteristics of stimuli to which adaptation is easy or rapid? We believe that the pursuit of cross-level analogies is likely to yield useful hypotheses for future research, and we hope that bringing together discussions of these levels under a single cover will advance that process.

    Cross-cutting this organization by levels of analysis, there is an organization by causes and contexts. It is useful to know the circumstances under which people are most likely to experience wellbeing or misery. For example, what is to be made of the finding that people experience many of their happiest moments in the presence of friends, whereas more intimate family relations are often loaded with substantial ambivalence?

    And what is the impact of insecurity about the future for example, for people with no health insurance on well-being?

    Issues like these have rarely been addressed in psychological research, but their investigation is likely to contribute to our basic understanding of hedonic experience as well as to psychologys relevance to society. We recognize, with a large degree of humility, that scientific understanding in this field is currently woefully inadequate to provide a strong underpinning for national policies. We believe, however, that in the decades to come there will be much greater success in understanding hedonics, and that principles will emerge that can be used by policy makers.

    We are particularly hopeful that a scientific understanding of hedonic experience will allow for the development of valid hedonic indicators that reflect the pleasantness of life in the everyday experiences of people. At present, economic indicators hold the most sway in policy circles. Yet, the economic approach is limited in several ways.

    First, it focuses on those aspects of life that can be traded in the marketplace. Thus, desirable goods such as love, mental challenge, and stress are given little consideration.